Comparison of performance with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fit

The initial-fit provided by the hearing aid manufacturer's software is generally a display of measurement done in the ear simulators. The need for verification of hearing aid output and gain in the real ear using probe-microphone measurement to match the prescriptive target is highlighted. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCoDAS (São Paulo) Vol. 34; no. 1; p. e20200310
Main Authors Narayanan, Sreena Ediyarath, Manjula, Puttabasappa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Brazil Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia 01.01.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The initial-fit provided by the hearing aid manufacturer's software is generally a display of measurement done in the ear simulators. The need for verification of hearing aid output and gain in the real ear using probe-microphone measurement to match the prescriptive target is highlighted. The objective of the study was to evaluate the difference in real-ear aided response (REAR), real-ear insertion gain (REIG), aided thresholds, articulation index (AI) and word recognition score (WRS) in quiet, with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and NAL-NL1 optimized-fit using the probe-microphone technique. In a repeated measure experimental design, 11 participants with a mean age of 41.09 (SD=±9.95) years having moderate and moderately-severe sensorineural hearing loss were tested monaurally in two aided conditions, with a 16-channel hearing aid programmed for manufacturer's NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fit to NAL-NL1 using probe-microphone verification. The REAR, REIG, aided threshold, articulation index and word recognition scores in quiet were obtained for both aided conditions. The REAR, REIG, aided threshold, AI and WRS in quiet were significantly better with the NAL-NL1 optimized-fit compared to manufacturer's NAL-NL1 first-fit. The optimized-fit yields better audibility and improved word recognition in quiet. This supports best practice guidelines of many professional organizations regarding the use of probe-microphone measurement as the "Gold standard" for verification of hearing aid fitting, thereby providing better satisfaction and quality of life to hearing aid users.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Author contributions: SEN participated in the data collection, analysis and interpretation and article writing; PM participated in the idealization of the study, analysis and interpretation, article review and editing and guiding.
Conflict of interests: nothing to declare.
ISSN:2317-1782
2317-1782
DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20212020310