Heat flow, heat capacity and thermal resistance of localized surfaces of the human body using a new calorimetric sensor

• Published in: Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry Vol. 147; no. 13; pp. 7385 - 7398
• Main Authors: Rodríguez de Rivera, Pedro Jesús, Rodríguez de Rivera, Miriam, Socorro, Fabiola, Callicó, Gustavo Marrero, Calbet, Jose A. L., Rodríguez de Rivera, Manuel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.07.2022; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Abdomen; Analytical Chemistry; Burns and scalds; Calorimetry; Chemistry; Chemistry and Materials Science; Conduction heating; Equivalence; Heat transfer; Heat transmission; Inorganic Chemistry; Measurement Science and Instrumentation; Measuring instruments; Penetration depth; Physical Chemistry; Polymer Sciences; Sensors; Skin; Specific heat; Thermal properties; Thermal resistance; Thermodynamic properties; Thermostats; Thigh; Wrist; Direct calorimetry; Non-differential calorimeters; Medical calorimetry; Physiology; Skin thermal properties; Heat conduction calorimeters; Human heat flow
• ISSN: 1388-6150; 1588-2926
• DOI: 10.1007/s10973-021-11062-0

A non-invasive sensor equipped with a programmable thermostat has been developed to assess in vivo the heat flow transmitted by conduction from human skin to the sensor thermostat. This device enables the assessment of the thermal properties of a 2 × 2 cm 2 skin surface with a thermal penetration depth of 3–4 mm. In this work, we report the thermal magnitudes recorded with this sensor in 6 different areas (temple, hand, abdomen, thigh, wrist and heel) of 6 healthy subjects of different genders and ages, which were measured under resting conditions. Heat flow and equivalent thermal resistance are proportionally related to each other and are highly variable in magnitude and different for each zone. The heat capacity is also different for each zone. The heat flow values varied from 362 ± 17 mW at the temple to 36 ± 12 mW at the heel for the same subject, when the sensor thermostat was set at 26 °C. The equivalent thermal resistance ranged from 23 ± 2 K W −1 in the volar area of the wrist to 52 ± 4 KW −1 in the inner thigh area. The heat capacity varies from 4.8 ± 0.4 J K −1 in the heel to 6.4 ± 0.2 J K −1 in the abdomen. These magnitudes were also assessed over a 2 × 1 cm 2 second-degree burn scar in the volar area of the wrist. The scar area had 27.6 and 11.6% lower heat capacity and equivalent thermal resistance, respectively, allowing an increased heat flow in the injured area. This work is a preliminary study of the measurement capacity of this new instrument.