An expanded typology of conflict at work: Task, relationship and non-task organizational conflict as social stressors

This study investigated the roles of three types of conflict at work - task, relationship and non-task organizational - in predicting employee strain. These conflict types refer to disputes over issues that are, respectively, work-task specific, driven by emotionally charged interpersonal animosity...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWork and stress Vol. 27; no. 4; pp. 339 - 350
Main Authors Bruk-Lee, Valentina, Nixon, Ashley E., Spector, Paul E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Routledge 01.10.2013
Taylor & Francis
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study investigated the roles of three types of conflict at work - task, relationship and non-task organizational - in predicting employee strain. These conflict types refer to disputes over issues that are, respectively, work-task specific, driven by emotionally charged interpersonal animosity or rooted in more broad organizationally relevant issues. Findings from a sample of 260 working adults from various organizations in the United States supported the notion that the three types of conflict function as social stressors and are related to a variety of psychological, behavioural and physical strains. They extend previous research based primarily on relationship conflict. Non-task organizational conflict emerged as a key predictor across strain criteria, thus highlighting the importance of including a more complete conceptualization of the conflict construct in social stress research. The results for task conflict are at variance with findings that it can be beneficial, and suggest that its negative relationship with well-being may be due to its co-occurrence with the other forms of conflict. These findings provide support for an expanded typology of conflict.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0267-8373
1464-5335
DOI:10.1080/02678373.2013.841303