Gefitinib, Methotrexate and Methotrexate plus 5-Fluorouracil as palliative treatment in recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

This study compared the efficacy and toxicity of Gefitinib, Methotrexate and Methotrexate plus 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN) treated with palliative intent. Patients with recurrent SCCHN not amenable to curative treatment were randoml...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer biology & therapy Vol. 16; no. 2; pp. 346 - 351
Main Authors Kushwaha, Vandana Singh, Gupta, Seema, Husain, Nuzhat, Khan, Huma, Negi, MPS, Jamal, Naseem, Ghatak, Ashim
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Taylor & Francis 01.02.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study compared the efficacy and toxicity of Gefitinib, Methotrexate and Methotrexate plus 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN) treated with palliative intent. Patients with recurrent SCCHN not amenable to curative treatment were randomly assigned to Gefitinib, Methotrexate or Methotrexate plus 5-FU arm. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points of interest were objective response rate, toxicity and quality of life. Total 117 patients were analyzed. Median overall survival and objective response rates were 8.8 months, 7.8 months and 8.1 months and 7.7%, 5.0% and 7.9% in Gefitinib, Methotrexate and Methotrexate plus 5-FU arms respectively with no statistically significant difference between 3 arms. Gefitinib had different toxicity profile compared with other arms. Majority of toxicities were Grade 1 or Grade 2. Gefitinib had significant improvement in quality of life during initial months over Methotrexate. There was no suggestion that Gefitinib significantly prolonged overall survival compared with Methotrexate and Methotrexate plus 5-FU. However, improved Quality of Life with manageable toxicities was observed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1538-4047
1555-8576
DOI:10.4161/15384047.2014.961881