Statistical guidelines for the analysis of data obtained from one or both eyes

• Published in: Ophthalmic & physiological optics Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 7 - 14
• Main Author: Armstrong, Richard A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2013
• Subjects: clinical and experimental optometry; Clinical Trials as Topic - methods; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Eye Diseases - therapy; Guidelines as Topic; Humans; one eye or two; ophthalmic and physiological optics; Optometry - statistics & numerical data; optometry and vision science; statistical guidelines
• ISSN: 0275-5408; 1475-1313; 1475-1313
• DOI: 10.1111/opo.12009

Purpose Measurements obtained from the right and left eye of a subject are often correlated whereas many statistical tests assume observations in a sample are independent. Hence, data collected from both eyes cannot be combined without taking this correlation into account. Current practice is reviewed with reference to articles published in three optometry journals, viz., Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics (OPO), Optometry and Vision Science (OVS), Clinical and Experimental Optometry (CEO) during the period 2009–2012. Recent findings Of the 230 articles reviewed, 148/230 (64%) obtained data from one eye and 82/230 (36%) from both eyes. Of the 148 one‐eye articles, the right eye, left eye, a randomly selected eye, the better eye, the worse or diseased eye, or the dominant eye were all used as selection criteria. Of the 82 two‐eye articles, the analysis utilized data from: (1) one eye only rejecting data from the adjacent eye, (2) both eyes separately, (3) both eyes taking into account the correlation between eyes, or (4) both eyes using one eye as a treated or diseased eye, the other acting as a control. In a proportion of studies, data were combined from both eyes without correction. Summary It is suggested that: (1) investigators should consider whether it is advantageous to collect data from both eyes, (2) if one eye is studied and both are eligible, then it should be chosen at random, and (3) two‐eye data can be analysed incorporating eyes as a ‘within subjects’ factor.