Virtual friend or threat? The effects of facial expression and gaze interaction on psychophysiological responses and emotional experience
The present study aimed to investigate the impact of facial expression, gaze interaction, and gender on attention allocation, physiological arousal, facial muscle responses, and emotional experience in simulated social interactions. Participants viewed animated virtual characters varying in terms of...
Saved in:
Published in | Psychophysiology Vol. 46; no. 5; pp. 922 - 931 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Malden, USA
Blackwell Publishing Inc
01.09.2009
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The present study aimed to investigate the impact of facial expression, gaze interaction, and gender on attention allocation, physiological arousal, facial muscle responses, and emotional experience in simulated social interactions. Participants viewed animated virtual characters varying in terms of gender, gaze interaction, and facial expression. We recorded facial EMG, fixation duration, pupil size, and subjective experience. Subject's rapid facial reactions (RFRs) differentiated more clearly between the character's happy and angry expression in the condition of mutual eye‐to‐eye contact. This finding provides evidence for the idea that RFRs are not simply motor responses, but part of an emotional reaction. Eye movement data showed that fixations were longer in response to both angry and neutral faces than to happy faces, thereby suggesting that attention is preferentially allocated to cues indicating potential threat during social interaction. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:9B2EF2C2F60F8CA5A37412D0BFAB8D5C76E9F6F5 ark:/67375/WNG-3PD7QJF1-N ArticleID:PSYP831 The authors wish to thank V. Klucharev, M. Meinhold, and B. Schalitz for help creating the virtual agents. Thanks are also due to U. Buhss, M. Fink, and T. Goschke for providing assistance with parts of the equipment and for support during data collection and analysis. J. R. Helmert, F. Mulvey, and M. Heubner made valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. This research was supported by two grants from the European NEST‐Pathfinder Projects PERCEPT (No. 043261) and MINET (No.043297). SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0048-5772 1469-8986 1469-8986 1540-5958 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00831.x |