The diagnostic conundrum in necrotizing otitis externa

Necrotizing otitis externa (NOE) is an aggressive and fast‐evolving infection of the external auditory canal. Late diagnoses and untreated cases can lead to severe, even fatal consequences and so early diagnosis and treatment are paramount. NOE is a notoriously challenging diagnosis to make. It is t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery Vol. 10; no. 1; pp. 59 - 65
Main Authors Ahmed, Abiya A., Rashid, Shaan, Gupta, Vinay K., Molony, Neil C., Gupta, Keshav K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.03.2024
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Necrotizing otitis externa (NOE) is an aggressive and fast‐evolving infection of the external auditory canal. Late diagnoses and untreated cases can lead to severe, even fatal consequences and so early diagnosis and treatment are paramount. NOE is a notoriously challenging diagnosis to make. It is therefore important to understand what diagnostic modalities are available and how otolaryngologists can use them to accurately treat such an aggressive disease. This review aims to evaluate the different diagnostic options available in NOE and discuss their advantages and limitations, thus, providing an up‐to‐date picture of the multimodal approach required in the diagnosis of this disease. Key points This study evaluates the current evidence available in diagnosing necrotizing otitis external (NOE). It summarizes the key advantages and disadvantages of the available diagnostic modalities. All diagnostic modalities play a complementary role in diagnosing NOE, tracking its progression, its prognosis, and its resolution. Ultimately a combination of modalities will be required in safely treating NOE.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:2095-8811
2589-1081
2589-1081
DOI:10.1002/wjo2.100