Pitch perception is more robust to interference and better resolved when provided by pulse rate than by modulation frequency of cochlear implant stimulation

• Published in: Hearing research Vol. 409; p. 108319
• Main Authors: Goldsworthy, Raymond L., Camarena, Andres, Bissmeyer, Susan R.S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 15.09.2021
• Subjects: Acoustic Stimulation; Auditory neuroscience; Cochlear Implantation; Cochlear Implants; Heart Rate; Humans; Interference; Modulation; Pitch; Pitch Perception; Speech Perception; Pitch; Cochlear implants; Auditory neuroscience; Modulation; Interference
• ISSN: 0378-5955; 1878-5891; 1878-5891
• DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108319

•Pitch discrimination is more robust when provided by cochlear implant stimulation rate than by amplitude modulation of constant stimulation rates.•Pitch discrimination is also better resolved when provided by stimulation rate than by modulation frequency.•The advantage of stimulation pulse rate compared to modulation frequency is most pronounced when electrical interference is spatially overlapping with the target stimulation. Cochlear implants are medical devices that have been used to restore hearing to more than half a million people worldwide. Most recipients achieve high levels of speech comprehension through these devices, but speech comprehension in background noise and music appreciation in general are markedly poor compared to normal hearing. A key aspect of hearing that is notably diminished in cochlear implant outcomes is the sense of pitch provided by these devices. Pitch perception is an important factor affecting speech comprehension in background noise and is critical for music perception. The present article summarizes two experiments that examine the robustness and resolution of pitch perception as provided by cochlear implant stimulation timing. The driving hypothesis is that pitch conveyed by stimulation timing cues is more robust and better resolved when provided by variable pulse rates than by modulation frequency of constant-rate stimulation. Experiment 1 examines the robustness for hearing a large, one-octave, pitch difference in the presence of interfering electrical stimulation. With robustness to interference characterized for an otherwise easily discernible pitch difference, Experiment 2 examines the resolution of discrimination thresholds in the presence of interference as conveyed by modulation frequency or by pulse rate. These experiments test for an advantage of stimulation with precise temporal cues. The results indicate that pitch provided by pulse rate is both more robust to interference and is better resolved compared to when provided by modulation frequency. These results should inform the development of new sound processing strategies for cochlear implants designed to encode fundamental frequency of sounds into precise temporal stimulation.