Community level interventions for pre-eclampsia (CLIP) in India: A cluster randomised controlled trial
•As implemented, the CLIP intervention did not improve the primary composite outcome.•ASHAs and ANMs were able to undertake all aspects of the mobile health app-guided visits.•Women could not be reached in their communities as frequently as planned.•Eight or more POM-guided contacts were associated...
Saved in:
Published in | Pregnancy hypertension Vol. 21; pp. 166 - 175 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Netherlands
Elsevier B.V
01.07.2020
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •As implemented, the CLIP intervention did not improve the primary composite outcome.•ASHAs and ANMs were able to undertake all aspects of the mobile health app-guided visits.•Women could not be reached in their communities as frequently as planned.•Eight or more POM-guided contacts were associated with fewer stillbirths supporting WHO guidance.•Community-level interventions are unlikely to improve outcomes without enhanced facility care.
Pregnancy hypertension is associated with 7.1% of maternal deaths in India. The objective of this trial was to assess whether task-sharing care might reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes related to delays in triage, transport, and treatment.
The Indian Community-Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia (CLIP) open-label cluster randomised controlled trial (NCT01911494) recruited pregnant women in 12 clusters (initial four-cluster internal pilot) in Belagavi and Bagalkote, Karnataka. The CLIP intervention (6 clusters) consisted of community engagement, community health workers (CHW) provided mobile health (mHeath)-guided clinical assessment, initial treatment, and referral to facility either urgently (<4 h) or non-urgently (<24 h), dependent on algorithm-defined risk. Treatment effect was estimated by multi-level logistic regression modelling, adjusted for prognostically-significant baseline variables. Predefined secondary analyses included safety and evaluation of the intensity of mHealth-guided CHW-provided contacts.
20% reduction in composite of maternal, fetal, and newborn mortality and major morbidity.
All 14,783 recruited pregnancies (7839 intervention, 6944 control) were followed-up. The primary outcome did not differ between intervention and control arms (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.92 [95% confidence interval 0.74, 1.15]; p = 0.47; intraclass correlation coefficient 0.013). There were no intervention-related safety concerns following administration of either methyldopa or MgSO4, and 401 facility referrals. Compared with intervention arm women without CLIP contacts, those with ≥8 contacts suffered fewer stillbirths (aOR 0.19 [0.10, 0.35]; p < 0.001), at the probable expense of survivable neonatal morbidity (aOR 1.39 [0.97, 1.99]; p = 0.072).
As implemented, solely community-level interventions focussed on pre-eclampsia did not improve outcomes in northwest Karnataka. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-2 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2210-7789 2210-7797 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.preghy.2020.05.008 |