Attention, processing speed, and executive functioning in pediatric brain tumor survivors treated with proton beam radiation therapy

This study examines attention, processing speed, and executive functioning in pediatric brain tumor survivors treated with proton beam radiation therapy (PBRT). We examined 39 survivors (age 6–19years) who were 3.61years post-PBRT on average. Craniospinal (CSI; n=21) and focal (n=18) subgroups were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRadiotherapy and oncology Vol. 124; no. 1; pp. 89 - 97
Main Authors Antonini, Tanya N., Ris, M. Douglas, Grosshans, David R., Mahajan, Anita, Okcu, M. Fatih, Chintagumpala, Murali, Paulino, Arnold, Child, Amanda E., Orobio, Jessica, Stancel, Heather H., Kahalley, Lisa S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.07.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study examines attention, processing speed, and executive functioning in pediatric brain tumor survivors treated with proton beam radiation therapy (PBRT). We examined 39 survivors (age 6–19years) who were 3.61years post-PBRT on average. Craniospinal (CSI; n=21) and focal (n=18) subgroups were analyzed. Attention, processing speed, and executive functioning scores were compared to population norms, and clinical/demographic risk factors were examined. As a group, survivors treated with focal PBRT exhibited attention, processing speed, and executive functioning that did not differ from population norms (all p>0.05). Performance in the CSI group across attention scales was normative (all p>0.05), but areas of relative weakness were identified on one executive functioning subtest and several processing speed subtests (all p<0.01). Survivors treated with PBRT may exhibit relative resilience in cognitive domains traditionally associated with radiation late effects. Attention, processing speed, and executive functioning remained intact and within normal limits for survivors treated with focal PBRT. Among survivors treated with CSI, a score pattern emerged that was suggestive of difficulties in underlying component skills (i.e., processing speed) rather than true executive dysfunction. No evidence of profound cognitive impairment was found in either group.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-8140
1879-0887
DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2017.06.010