Report of RILEM TC 267-TRM phase 2: optimization and testing of the robustness of the R3 reactivity tests for supplementary cementitious materials

The results of phase 1 of an interlaboratory test, coordinated by the RILEM TC 267-TRM “Tests for Reactivity of Supplementary Cementitious Materials” showed that the R 3 (rapid, relevant, reliable) test method, by measurement of heat release or bound water, provided the most reliable and relevant de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMaterials and structures Vol. 55; no. 3
Main Authors Avet, François, Li, Xuerun, Ben Haha, Mohsen, Bernal, Susan A., Bishnoi, Shashank, Cizer, Özlem, Cyr, Martin, Dolenec, Sabina, Durdzinski, Pawel, Haufe, Johannes, Hooton, Doug, Juenger, Maria C. G., Kamali-Bernard, Siham, Londono-Zuluaga, Diana, Marsh, Alastair T. M., Marroccoli, Milena, Mrak, Marusa, Parashar, Anuj, Patapy, Cédric, Pedersen, Malene, Provis, John L., Sabio, Serge, Schulze, Simone, Snellings, Ruben, Telesca, Antonio, Thomas, Michael, Vargas, Felipe, Vollpracht, Anya, Walkley, Brant, Winnefeld, Frank, Ye, Guang, Zhang, Shizhe, Scrivener, Karen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.04.2022
Springer Nature B.V
Springer Verlag
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The results of phase 1 of an interlaboratory test, coordinated by the RILEM TC 267-TRM “Tests for Reactivity of Supplementary Cementitious Materials” showed that the R 3 (rapid, relevant, reliable) test method, by measurement of heat release or bound water, provided the most reliable and relevant determination of the chemical reactivity of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), compared to other test methods. The phase 2 work, described in this paper aimed to improve the robustness of the test procedure and to develop precision statements for the consolidated test procedure. The effect of the pre-mixing and mixing conditions, and the impact of the mix design on the test method robustness were assessed and fixed for optimal conditions to carry out the R 3 heat release test. The effect of the drying step was evaluated to define the R 3 bound water test procedure in more detail. Finally, the robustness of the consolidated final test methods was determined by an interlaboratory study to define the precision statements.
ISSN:1359-5997
1871-6873
DOI:10.1617/s11527-022-01928-6