The streetlight effect in climate change research on Africa

•Investigates uneven coverage of African cases in climate change literature.•Proposes need-based and convenience/capacity-based explanations for case coverage.•Demonstrates bias toward coverage of former British colonies.•Demonstrates bias toward more open political systems.•Discusses implications f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGlobal environmental change Vol. 43; pp. 137 - 147
Main Author Hendrix, Cullen S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2017
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Investigates uneven coverage of African cases in climate change literature.•Proposes need-based and convenience/capacity-based explanations for case coverage.•Demonstrates bias toward coverage of former British colonies.•Demonstrates bias toward more open political systems.•Discusses implications for funding agencies and IPCC process. The streetlight effect is the tendency for researchers to focus on particular questions, cases and variables for reasons of convenience or data availability rather than broader relevance, policy import, or construct validity. To what extent does the streetlight effect condition the state of knowledge about climate change in Africa? Analysis of Google Scholar search results, both general and within leading climate change-related journals, reveals that two proxies for objective need, population and land mass, are associated with a higher volume of scholarly attention. Countries with greater exposure to the negative effects of climate change and countries with less adaptive capacity do not receive more scholarly attention. Rather, I find evidence that factors like British colonial history, strong civil liberties, and to a lesser extent political stability − factors not directly related to risks from climate change − affect scholarly attention. The streetlight effect is evident in climate change research on Africa.
ISSN:0959-3780
1872-9495
DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.01.009