Study of Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Renal Allograft Biopsies

Abstract Introduction Acute B-cell-mediated rejection (AMR) was ill-defined until the 6th Banff meeting establishing the criteria. We performed a retrospective analysis of renal allograft biopsies to evaluate immune injury with reference to the Ahmedabad Tolerance Induction Protocols (ATIP). Methods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTransplantation proceedings Vol. 40; no. 4; pp. 1099 - 1103
Main Authors Kanodia, K.V, Vanikar, A.V, Trivedi, H.L
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.05.2008
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Introduction Acute B-cell-mediated rejection (AMR) was ill-defined until the 6th Banff meeting establishing the criteria. We performed a retrospective analysis of renal allograft biopsies to evaluate immune injury with reference to the Ahmedabad Tolerance Induction Protocols (ATIP). Methods We evaluated renal allograft biopsies belonging to 3 groups: group A patients (n = 120) underwent a modified ATIP with addition of mesenchymal stem cells, anti-B-cell antibodies, and higher target-specific irradiation; group B patients (n = 351) belong to the old ATIP; and group C (n = 142) were controls who opted out of ATIP. The majority were biopsied 2 or 3 times. Biopsies were subdivided: ≤60 days, 61 to 180 days, or 181 to 365 days' posttransplant. We compared demographics and diagnoses per the modified Banff criteria. Results At ≤60 days' posttransplantation, acute T-cell-mediated rejection (ATIR) was noted in 1.7% of group A patients; 5.98% of B; 33.8% of C with AMR in 11.7% of A; 10.8% of B; and 24.6% of C. At 61 to 180 days' posttransplant, ATIR was absent in group A, 1.99% in group B, and 21.83% in controls, whereas AMR was absent in group A; 1.7% in group B; and 39.4% of controls. At 181 to 365 days, ATIR and AMR were absent in group A; ATIR was 0.56% in group B and 14.1% in controls; AMR was 0.85% in group B and 21.1% in controls. The immunosuppression included cyclosporine (mg/kgBW/day) was 1.5 ± 0.1 in group A; 2 ± 0.5 in group B; and prednisone (mg/kgBW/day), 0.15 in group A, 0.2 in group B. The controls received standard doses. Conclusion The modified ATIP has reduced immunosuppressive drug dose requirements and lessened ATIR; however, AMR, although significantly less than controls, needs to be addressed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0041-1345
1873-2623
DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.112