Overestimation of the effect of (fos)aprepitant on intravenous dexamethasone pharmacokinetics requires adaptation of the guidelines for children with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

• Published in: Supportive care in cancer Vol. 30; no. 12; pp. 9991 - 9999
• Main Authors: Nijstad, A. Laura, de Vos-Kerkhof, Evelien, Enters-Weijnen, Catherine F., van de Wetering, Marianne D., Tissing, Wim J. E., Tibben, Matthijs M., Rosing, Hilde, Lalmohamed, Arief, Huitema, Alwin D. R., Zwaan, C. Michel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.12.2022; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Analysis; Antiemetics; Aprepitant; Cancer; Chemotherapy; Children; Clinical practice guidelines; Dexamethasone; Drug dosages; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Nausea; Nursing; Nursing Research; Oncology; Pain Medicine; Patient safety; Pediatrics; Pharmacokinetics; Rehabilitation Medicine; Side effects; Steroids; Vomiting; Antiemetics; Pediatrics; Oncology; Pharmacokinetics; Childhood cancer
• ISSN: 0941-4355; 1433-7339
• DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07423-6

Purpose Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are common side effects in pediatric oncology treatment. Besides 5-HT 3 -antagonists, both dexamethasone and aprepitant are cornerstone drugs in controlling these side effects. Based on results of adult studies, the dexamethasone dose is reduced by 50% when combined with aprepitant, because of a drug-drug interaction, even though data on the interaction in children is lacking. The current study was developed to investigate the effect of aprepitant on dexamethasone clearance (CL) in children, in order to assess if dexamethasone dose reduction for concomitant use of aprepitant is appropriate in the current antiemetic regimen. Methods In total, 65 children (0.6–17.9 years), receiving intravenous or oral antiemetic therapy (dexamethasone ± aprepitant) as standard of care, were included. 305 dexamethasone plasma concentrations were determined using LC–MS/MS. An integrated dexamethasone and aprepitant pharmacokinetic model was developed using non-linear mixed effects modelling in order to investigate the effect of aprepitant administration on dexamethasone CL. Results In this population, dexamethasone CL in patients with concomitant administration of aprepitant was reduced by approximately 30% of the uninhibited CL (23.3 L/h (95% confidence interval 20.4–26.0)). This result is not consistent with the results of adult studies (50% reduction). This difference was not age dependent, but might be related to the route of administration of dexamethasone. Future studies are needed to assess the difference in oral/intravenous dexamethasone. Conclusion When dexamethasone is given intravenously as a component of triple therapy to prevent CINV in children, we advise to reduce the dexamethasone dose by 30% instead of 50%.