The effect of processing variables on morphological and mechanical properties of supercritical CO2 foamed scaffolds for tissue engineering

The porous structure of a scaffold determines the ability of bone to regenerate within this environment. In situations where the scaffold is required to provide mechanical function, balance must be achieved between optimizing porosity and maximizing mechanical strength. Supercritical CO2 foaming can...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa biomaterialia Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 61 - 71
Main Authors White, Lisa J., Hutter, Victoria, Tai, Hongyun, Howdle, Steven M., Shakesheff, Kevin M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The porous structure of a scaffold determines the ability of bone to regenerate within this environment. In situations where the scaffold is required to provide mechanical function, balance must be achieved between optimizing porosity and maximizing mechanical strength. Supercritical CO2 foaming can produce open-cell, interconnected structures in a low-temperature, solvent-free process. In this work, we report on foams of varying structural and mechanical properties fabricated from different molecular weights of poly(dl-lactic acid) PdlLA (57, 25 and 15kDa) and by varying the depressurization rate. Rapid depressurization rates produced scaffolds with homogeneous pore distributions and some closed pores. Decreasing the depressurization rate produced scaffolds with wider pore size distributions and larger, more interconnected pores. In compressive testing, scaffolds produced from 57kDa PdlLA exhibited typical stress–strain curves for elastomeric open-cell foams whereas scaffolds fabricated from 25 and 15kDa PdlLA behaved as brittle foams. The structural and mechanical properties of scaffolds produced from 57kDa PdlLA by scCO2 ensure that these scaffolds are suitable for potential applications in bone tissue engineering.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.032
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1742-7061
1878-7568
DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.032