Self-Protection in the Expected-Utility-of-Wealth Model: An Impossibility Theorem
We investigate the possibility of ordering expected utility-of-wealth maximizers according to their propensities to purchase self-protection. We define one agent as "more cautious" than another (toward a loss of specific size given a specific initial wealth) if the first agent would spend...
Saved in:
Published in | The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory Vol. 17; no. 2; pp. 147 - 157 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Boston
Kluwer Academic Publishers
01.12.1992
Palgrave Macmillan |
Series | The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We investigate the possibility of ordering expected utility-of-wealth maximizers according to their propensities to purchase self-protection. We define one agent as "more cautious" than another (toward a loss of specific size given a specific initial wealth) if the first agent would spend more on self-protection than the other, so long as the technological relationship between spending and loss probability belongs to a broad class of functions. We show that the expected-utility-of-wealth model does not allow for the possibility that one agent could be "more cautious" than another. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0926-4957 1554-964X 1573-6954 1554-9658 |
DOI: | 10.1007/BF00962711 |