The Mount Sinai Patient-Centered Preoperative Criteria Meant to Optimize Outcomes Are Less of a Barrier to Care Than WPATH SOC 7 Criteria Before Transgender-Specific Surgery

• Published in: Transgender health Vol. 5; no. 3; pp. 166 - 172
• Main Authors: Lichtenstein, Max, Stein, Laura, Connolly, Erin, Goldstein, Zil G, Martinson, Tyler, Tiersten, Linda, Shin, Sangyoon J, Pang, John Henry, Safer, Joshua D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 01.09.2020; Mary Ann Liebert, Inc
• Subjects: Consent; Datasets; Endocrine therapy; Gastrointestinal surgery; Gender dysphoria; Gender identity; Health services; Medical personnel; Mental health; Original; Original Articles; Patients; Professionals; Social work; Thoracic surgery; Transgender persons; Vagina; United States > US; vaginoplasty; standards of care; transgender; readiness criteria; surgery
• ISSN: 2380-193X; 2688-4887; 2380-193X
• DOI: 10.1089/trgh.2019.0066

Objectives: With expanding coverage of gender-affirming care in the United States, many insurers default to the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) Standards of Care 7 (SOC 7) to establish eligibility requirements for surgery coverage. Informed by bariatric and transplant surgery evaluation models, the Mount Sinai Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery (CTMS) developed patient-centered criteria to assess readiness for surgery, focusing on concerns that could impair recovery. To make recommendations for the next version of the WPATH SOC, SOC 8, we compared Mount Sinai patient-centered surgical readiness criteria with the WPATH SOC 7 criteria. Methods: Data were extracted from a deidentified data set developed as part the quality dashboard for CTMS. The data set included all patients seeking vaginoplasty who were evaluated by a single mental health provider, from July 2016 through August 2018, and who completed the full CTMS assessment. The number of patients eligible for surgery based on the Mount Sinai CTMS criteria was compared with the number of patients eligible for surgery according to WPATH SOC 7 criteria. Results: Of 139 patients identified, 63 (45%) were ready for surgery immediately based on the Mount Sinai patient-centered model. By contrast, only 21 (15%) out of the 139 met criteria for surgery based on WPATH SOC 7. Fifty patients (40%) were ready for surgery as per Mount Sinai patient-centered readiness review but not WPATH criteria. Conclusion: An assessment designed to better prepare patients for surgery may also result in fewer barriers to care than existing criteria used by insurance companies in the United States.