Impact of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition on morbidity and mortality during long-term continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support: An IMACS report

• Published in: The Journal of heart and lung transplantation Vol. 40; no. 12; pp. 1605 - 1613
• Main Authors: Brinkley, D. Marshall, Wang, Li, Yu, Chang, Grandin, E. Wilson, Kiernan, Michael S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.12.2021
• Subjects: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists - therapeutic use; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors - therapeutic use; Female; heart failure; Heart Failure - mortality; Heart Failure - physiopathology; Heart Failure - therapy; Heart-Assist Devices; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists - therapeutic use; mortality; Propensity Score; Registries; renin angiotensin aldosterone system; Renin-Angiotensin System; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Survival Analysis; heart failure; GDMT; heart-assist devices; CI; RAAS; HR; LVAD; ARB; renin angiotensin aldosterone system; mortality; ACEI; MRA; HF
• ISSN: 1053-2498; 1557-3117
• DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.08.015

Inhibition of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) improves survival and reduces adverse cardiac events in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but the benefit is not well-defined following left ventricular assist device (LVAD). We analyzed the ISHLT IMACS registry for adults with a primary, continuous-flow LVAD from January 2013 to September 2017 who were alive at postoperative month 3 without a major adverse event, and categorized patients according to treatment an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI/ARB) or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). Propensity score matching was performed separately for ACEI/ARB vs none (n = 4,118 each) and MRA vs none (n = 3,892 each). Of 11,494 patients included, 50% were treated with ACEI/ARB and 38% with MRA. Kaplan-Meier survival was significantly better for patients receiving ACEI/ARB (p < 0.001) but not MRA (p = 0.31). In Cox proportional hazards analyses adjusted for known predictors of mortality following LVAD, ACEI/ARB use (hazard ratio 0.81 [95% confidence interval 0.71-0.93], p < 0.0001) but not MRA use (hazard ratio 1.03 [95% confidence interval 0.88-1.21], p = 0.69) was independently associated with lower mortality. Among patients treated with an ACEI/ARB, there was a significantly lower unadjusted risk of cardiovascular death (p < 0.001), risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.01), and creatinine level (p < 0.001). MRA therapy was associated with lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.01) but higher risk of hemolysis (p < 0.01). Potential limitations include residual confounding and therapy crossover. These findings suggest a benefit for ACEI/ARB therapy in patients with heart failure after LVAD implantation.