A multicenter comparison of the safety of oral versus intravenous acetylcysteine for treatment of acetaminophen overdose
Oral and intravenous (IV) N-acetylcysteine (NAC) are used for the treatment of acetaminophen poisoning. The objective of this multicenter study was to compare the safety of these two routes of administration. Methods. We conducted a multicenter chart review of all patients treated with NAC for aceta...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) Vol. 48; no. 5; pp. 424 - 430 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Informa UK Ltd
01.06.2010
Taylor & Francis |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Oral and intravenous (IV) N-acetylcysteine (NAC) are used for the treatment of acetaminophen poisoning. The objective of this multicenter study was to compare the safety of these two routes of administration. Methods. We conducted a multicenter chart review of all patients treated with NAC for acetaminophen poisoning. The primary safety outcome was the percentage of patients with NAC-related adverse events. Results. A total of 503 subjects were included in the safety analysis (306 IV-only, 145 oral-only, and 52 both routes). There were no serious adverse events related to NAC for either route. Nausea and vomiting were the most common related adverse events and were more common with oral treatment (23 vs. 9%). Anaphylactoid reactions were more common with IV administration (6 vs. 2%). Conclusions. IV and oral NAC are generally mild adverse drug reactions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1556-3650 1556-9519 |
DOI: | 10.3109/15563650.2010.486381 |