Timing of Operative Intervention in Traumatic Spine Injuries Without Neurological Deficit

Abstract BACKGROUND Numerous studies have demonstrated the benefits of early decompression and stabilization in unstable spine injuries with incomplete neurological deficits. However, a clear consensus on timing to operative intervention still does not exist in those with a normal neurological exam...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeurosurgery Vol. 83; no. 5; pp. 1015 - 1022
Main Authors Kim, Elliott J, Wick, Joseph B, Stonko, David P, Chotai, Silky, Freeman Jr, Thomas H, Douleh, Diana G, Mistry, Akshitkumar M, Parker, Scott L, Devin, Clinton J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Oxford University Press 01.11.2018
Copyright by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons
Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract BACKGROUND Numerous studies have demonstrated the benefits of early decompression and stabilization in unstable spine injuries with incomplete neurological deficits. However, a clear consensus on timing to operative intervention still does not exist in those with a normal neurological exam and unstable spine. OBJECTIVE To determine the optimal timing of operative intervention in traumatic spine injuries without neurological deficit. METHODS Retrospective chart review at a single institution was performed including patients with traumatic spine injuries without neurological deficit admitted from December 2001 to August 2012. Estimated intraoperative blood loss (EBL), in-hospital complications, postoperative hospital length of stay (HLOS), intensive care unit length of stay (ICULOS), and ventilator days were recorded. Delayed surgery was defined as surgery 72 h after admission. RESULTS A total of 456 patients were included for analysis. There was a trend towards statistical significance between the time to operative intervention and EBL in bivariate analysis (P = .07). In the risk-adjusted multivariable analysis delayed vs early surgery was not associated with increased EBL or complications. Delayed surgery was associated with increased ICULOS (odds ratio [OR] = 2.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38-3.51; P = .001), ventilator days (OR = 2.09; 95% CI: 1.28-3.43; P = .004), and increased postoperative HLOS (OR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.22-2.76; P = .004). CONCLUSION Earlier operative intervention was associated with decreased ICULOS, ventilator days, and postoperative HLOS and did not show a statistically significant increase in EBL or complications. Earlier operative intervention for traumatic spine injuries without neurological deficit provides better outcomes compared to delayed surgery.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0148-396X
1524-4040
DOI:10.1093/neuros/nyx569