Intra‐ocular pressure changes following laryngeal mask airway insertion: a comparative study

We compared the effects of the Brain laryngeal mask airway with a tracheal tube on intra‐ocular pressure. Propofol was used as induction agent and atracurium as relaxant. Twenty‐six patients with normal intra‐ocular pressure undergoing cataract surgery were randomly allocated to two groups. Group A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnaesthesia Vol. 52; no. 8; pp. 794 - 796
Main Authors Whitford, A. M., Hone, S. W., O'Hare, B., Magner, J., Eustace, P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.08.1997
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We compared the effects of the Brain laryngeal mask airway with a tracheal tube on intra‐ocular pressure. Propofol was used as induction agent and atracurium as relaxant. Twenty‐six patients with normal intra‐ocular pressure undergoing cataract surgery were randomly allocated to two groups. Group A (n = 13) had a laryngeal mask airway inserted and Group B (n = 13) had a tracheal tube inserted. Intra‐ocular pressure was measured just before insertion of the airway, 20 s after insertion and at 2 min. In the laryngeal mask airway group there were no significant changes in mean intra‐ocular pressure. In the tracheal tube group there was a significant rise in mean intra‐ocular pressure at 20 s (p = 0.0056) which returned to pre‐insertion levels at 2 min. We conclude that the laryngeal mask airway continues to have advantages over the tracheal tube for ophthalmic surgery despite the use of propofol and atracurium as anaesthetic agents.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-2409
1365-2044
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.186-az0317.x