Attachment Behavior at Home and in the Laboratory: Q-Sort Observations and Strange Situation Classifications of One-Year-Olds

This article reports Attachment Q-set data and Strange Situation classifications of 58 1-year-old middle-class infants. Security, dependency, and sociability were scored from Q-sort reports of home observations. The primary analyses involve comparisons between securely attached infants (Group B) and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChild development Vol. 61; no. 6; pp. 1965 - 1973
Main Authors Vaughn, Brian E., Waters, Everett
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.1990
University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press for the Society for Research in Child Development, etc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This article reports Attachment Q-set data and Strange Situation classifications of 58 1-year-old middle-class infants. Security, dependency, and sociability were scored from Q-sort reports of home observations. The primary analyses involve comparisons between securely attached infants (Group B) and anxiously attached infants (Groups A and C combined). Additional analyses compare anxious-resistant with anxious-avoidant infants. Secure classification in the Strange Situation was associated with quality of secure-base behavior at home (i. e., higher Q-sort security scores) and with sociability, but not with dependency scores. Descriptive analyses of individual Q-set items support the secure-base interpretation of Strange Situation security classifications. Relations between home security scores and interactive behavior scores from the Strange Situation were also examined by multiple regression analysis.
Bibliography:ArticleID:CDEV1965
ark:/67375/WNG-4C69SZNC-0
istex:435C346DD8880165F2581BFC7D28477F99154C53
This research has been supported by Young Scholars in Socio‐Emotional Development grants to both authors from the Foundation for Child Development, and grant HD 18‐296 from the National Institutes of Health. The authors are grateful for the assistance of nancy Molitor, Kimm Hron‐Stewart, Gretchen Lefever, and Karen Ross.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0009-3920
1467-8624
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb03578.x