Phase II study of personalized peptide vaccination for castration-resistant prostate cancer patients who failed in docetaxel-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND Docetaxel‐based chemotherapy (DBC) showed limited clinical efficacy for castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients. To explore cancer vaccine as a new treatment modality, we conducted a phase II study of personalized peptide vaccine (PPV) for DBC‐resistant CRPC patients. METHODS...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Prostate Vol. 72; no. 8; pp. 834 - 845
Main Authors Noguchi, Masanori, Moriya, Fukuko, Suekane, Shigetaka, Matsuoka, Kei, Arai, Gaku, Matsueda, Satoko, Sasada, Tetsuro, Yamada, Akira, Itoh, Kyogo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.06.2012
Wiley-Liss
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND Docetaxel‐based chemotherapy (DBC) showed limited clinical efficacy for castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients. To explore cancer vaccine as a new treatment modality, we conducted a phase II study of personalized peptide vaccine (PPV) for DBC‐resistant CRPC patients. METHODS Twenty DBC‐resistant CRPC patients and 22 patients with no prior DBC, as a control, were treated with PPV using peptides chosen from 31 peptides in patients, respectively. Cytokines, inflammatory markers, and immune responses were measured as candidate biomarkers. DBC‐resistant CRPC patients without PPV was set as a historical control for evaluation of clinical benefit of PPV. RESULTS Median overall survival (OS) time from the first vaccination was 14.8 months or not reached in DBC‐resistant CRPC patients and patients with no prior DBC (log‐rank; P = 0.07), respectively. Median OS time from the first day of progression disease was 17.8 and 10.5 months in DBC‐resistant CRPC patients receiving PPV and those with no PPV (P = 0.1656), respectively. Elevated IL‐6 levels before vaccination was an unfavorable factor for OS of DBC‐resistant CRPC patients (P = 0.0161, hazard ratio (HR): 0.024, 95% CI:0.001–0.499) as well as all 42 patients with PPV(P = 0.0011, HR: 0.212, 95% CI:0.068–0.661) by multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS Further clinical study of PPV is recommended for DBC‐resistant CRPC patients, because of the safety and possible prolongation of MST. Control of elevated IL‐6 by combined therapy may provide much better clinical outcome. Prostate 72:834–845, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:istex:24A9C43589F276EE5978A97A7EF24A72C73D9137
ArticleID:PROS21485
ark:/67375/WNG-5H3175W5-2
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0270-4137
1097-0045
DOI:10.1002/pros.21485