Prone versus supine sleep position: A review of the physiological studies in SIDS research

:  A number of physiological studies, published over the last 10 years, have investigated the links between prone sleeping and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). This review evaluates those studies and derives an overview of the different affects of sleeping prone or supine in infancy. Generally,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of paediatrics and child health Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 332 - 338
Main Authors Galland, BC, Taylor, BJ, Bolton, DPG
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Pty 01.08.2002
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary::  A number of physiological studies, published over the last 10 years, have investigated the links between prone sleeping and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). This review evaluates those studies and derives an overview of the different affects of sleeping prone or supine in infancy. Generally, compared with the supine, the prone position raises arousal and wakening thresholds, promotes sleep and reduces autonomic activity through decreased parasympathetic activity, decreased sympathetic activity or an imbalance between the two systems. In addition, resting ventilation and ventilatory drive is improved in preterm infants, but in older infants (>1 month), there is no improvement in ventilation, and in 3‐month‐old infants, the position is adverse in terms of poorer ventilatory drive (in active sleep only). The majority of findings suggest a reduction in physiological control related to respiratory, cardiovascular and autonomic control mechanisms, including arousal during sleep in the prone position. Since the majority of these findings are from studies of healthy infants, continued reinforcement of the supine sleep recommendations for all infants is emphasized.
Bibliography:istex:C43F475694D739FB32CEBD78B77F8BD4B1698CD0
ark:/67375/WNG-SBDG57BW-W
ArticleID:JPC002
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1034-4810
1440-1754
DOI:10.1046/j.1440-1754.2002.00002.x