Numerical investigation of blade shape in static mixing

• Published in: AIChE journal Vol. 51; no. 1; pp. 44 - 58
• Main Authors: Heniche, M., Tanguy, P. A., Reeder, M. F., Fasano, J. B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.01.2005; Wiley Subscription Services; American Institute of Chemical Engineers
• Subjects: Applied sciences; CFD; Chemical engineering; Comparative analysis; Dimensional analysis; Exact sciences and technology; Fluid dynamics; Hydrodynamics of contact apparatus; in-line mixing; KMX; laminar flow; particle tracking; Simulation; SMX; static mixer; Viscosity; CFD; High resolution; Mixing; Shear; Computational fluid dynamics; Segregation; Benchmarks; Hydrodynamics; particle tracking; Flow field; Design; Laminar flow; Pressure drop; in-line mixing; Morphology; Mixing quality; Lyapunov exponent; Static mixer; KMX; Newtonian fluid; SMX
• ISSN: 0001-1541; 1547-5905
• DOI: 10.1002/aic.10341

The mixing performance of the KMX and SMX static mixers have been compared using 3D high‐resolution computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Although these mixers have a similar design composed of layers of blades, their blade shape is different: curved for the KMX and flat for the SMX. The flow of a Newtonian fluid in steady laminar regime has been considered as the benchmark of the study. The simulation was first validated by assessing the pressure drop vs. the number of mixer elements and the results were found to be in good agreement with experimental data. To evaluate the mixing quality, cross‐section stream function, extensional efficiency, mean shear rate, residence time, intensity of segregation, stretching, and Lyapunov exponent have been selected. Analysis of the flow pattern and mixing parameters shows differences between the mixers and it appears that the curved blade is more efficient than the flat blade design at the expense of a slightly higher pressure drop. In practice, the KMX mixer should provide a higher mixing rate at high viscosity ratio than the SMX mixer. © 2004 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 51: 44–58, 2005