Mahonia vs. Berberis Unloaded: Generic Delimitation and Infrafamilial Classification of Berberidaceae Based on Plastid Phylogenomics

The early-diverging eudicot family Berberidaceae is composed of a morphologically diverse assemblage of disjunctly distributed genera long praised for their great horticultural and medicinal values. However, despite century-long studies, generic delimitation of Berberidaceae remains controversial an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in plant science Vol. 12; p. 720171
Main Authors Hsieh, Chia-Lun, Yu, Chih-Chieh, Huang, Yu-Lan, Chung, Kuo-Fang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 06.01.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The early-diverging eudicot family Berberidaceae is composed of a morphologically diverse assemblage of disjunctly distributed genera long praised for their great horticultural and medicinal values. However, despite century-long studies, generic delimitation of Berberidaceae remains controversial and its tribal classification has never been formally proposed under a rigorous phylogenetic context. Currently, the number of accepted genera in Berberidaceae ranges consecutively from 13 to 19, depending on whether to define , , and broadly, or to segregate these three genera further and recognize , , and , , and , , and , respectively. To resolve Berberidaceae's taxonomic disputes, we newly assembled 23 plastomes and, together with 85 plastomes from the GenBank, completed the generic sampling of the family. With 4 problematic and 14 redundant plastome sequences excluded, robust phylogenomic relationships were reconstructed based on 93 plastomes representing all 19 genera of Berberidaceae and three outgroups. Maximum likelihood phylogenomic relationships corroborated with divergence time estimation support the recognition of three subfamilies Berberidoideae, Nandinoideae, and Podophylloideae, with tribes Berberideae and Ranzanieae, Leonticeae and Nandineae, and Podophylleae, Achlydeae, Bongardieae , Epimedieae, and Jeffersonieae . in the former three subfamilies, respectively. By applying specifically stated criteria, our phylogenomic data also support the classification of 19 genera, recognizing , , and , , and , , and that are morphologically and evolutionarily distinct from , , and , respectively. Comparison of plastome structures across Berberidaceae confirms inverted repeat expansion in the tribe Berberideae and reveals substantial length variation in gene caused by repeated sequences in Berberidoideae. Comparison of plastome tree with previous studies and nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) phylogeny also reveals considerable conflicts at different phylogenetic levels, suggesting that incomplete lineage sorting and/or hybridization had occurred throughout the evolutionary history of Berberidaceae and that and could have resulted from reciprocal hybridization between and in ancient times prior to the radiations of the latter two genera.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Plant Systematics and Evolution, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Edited by: Susann Wicke, Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany
Reviewed by: Ana Otero, Field Museum of Natural History, United States; Ross McCauley, Fort Lewis College, United States; Diego F. Morales-Briones, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany
ISSN:1664-462X
1664-462X
DOI:10.3389/fpls.2021.720171