Robotic rectal resection for cancer: A prospective cohort study to analyze surgical, clinical and oncological outcomes

Aim: Robotic systems are getting widely spread in recent years given the different technical advantages over traditional laparoscopy. Rectal surgery seems to benefit from this approach, for its ability to easily work in a confined space such as the pelvic cavity. The objective is to present results...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of surgery (London, England) Vol. 12; no. 12; pp. 1456 - 1461
Main Authors Parisi, Amilcare, Desiderio, Jacopo, Trastulli, Stefano, Cirocchi, Roberto, Ricci, Francesco, Farinacci, Federico, Mangia, Antongiulio, Boselli, Carlo, Noya, Giuseppe, Filippini, Angelo, D'Andrea, Vito, Santoro, Alberto
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aim: Robotic systems are getting widely spread in recent years given the different technical advantages over traditional laparoscopy. Rectal surgery seems to benefit from this approach, for its ability to easily work in a confined space such as the pelvic cavity. The objective is to present results obtained by the robotic approach in patients with rectal cancer and to give technical considerations. Method: Data were prospectively collected in order to evaluate surgical and oncological outcomes. Subjects underwent robotic rectal resection in the period between June 2011 and June 2014 at the Department of Digestive Surgery, “S. Maria” Hospital – Terni (Italy). Main outcome measures: Patient characteristics and tumor, overall operative time, conversion to open surgery, site of mini-laparotomy for specimen extraction, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative complications, time to first bowel movement, time-to-liquid and solid intake, postoperative complications, mortality, hospital stay, thirty-day complications, histopathological examination. Results: 40 consecutive patients underwent robotic resection of the rectum. Median operative time was 340 min (235–460 min), no procedure was converted. Median hospital stay was 5 days (3–18 days). Mesorectum resection was complete in all patients. Median number of harvested lymph nodes was 19 (6–35), median distal resection margin was 4 cm (2–8 cm). Conclusion: Robotic rectal surgery is safe and feasible in particular by facilitating the surgeon during the delicate phases of tissue dissection. •Robotic System is more available in last years.•Patients with rectal cancer could benefit from this approach.•The dissection phase results improved.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1743-9191
1743-9159
1743-9159
DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.012