Prefrontal BDNF Levels After Anodal Epidural Direct Current Stimulation in Rats
This study measured levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) after single (S) and repetitive (R) anodal epidural DC stimulation (eDCS) over the left medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Male Wistar rats ( = 4 per group) received single application of sham (S-sham...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in pharmacology Vol. 9; p. 755 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Media S.A
12.07.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This study measured levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) after single (S) and repetitive (R) anodal epidural DC stimulation (eDCS) over the left medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Male Wistar rats (
= 4 per group) received single application of sham (S-sham) or anodal eDCS (S-eDCS) (400 μA for 11 min) and had their PFC removed 15, 30, or 60 min later. For repetitive brain stimulation, rats received sham (R-sham) or anodal eDCS (R-eDCS) once a day, five consecutive days, and their PFC were removed 24 h after the last application. BDNF isoforms levels were measured by Western blot assays. It was observed that animals receiving S-eDCS showed smaller (
< 0.01) levels of BDNF 15 min after stimulation when compared to S-sham, especially in its mature form (mBDNF
< 0.001). Levels of BDNF, including mBDNF, were almost like the S-sham at 30 and 60 min intervals after stimulation, but not proBDNF, which was significantly smaller (
< 0.05) than S-sham at these intervals. After five sessions, BDNF levels were higher in the PFC of R-eDCS animals, notably the proBDNF (
< 0.01) when compared to R-sham. This study showed that levels of BDNF in the PFC, especially the proBDNF, were lower after a single and higher after repetitive anodal eDCS applied over the left mPFC when compared to sham. Therefore, changes of prefrontal BDNF levels may disclose molecular changes underlying the plasticity induced by cortical anodal DC stimulation, which may be opposite if applied in single or multiple sessions. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 These authors have contributed equally to this work. This article was submitted to Neuropharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology Edited by: Tod Edward Kippin, University of California, Santa Barbara, United States Reviewed by: Ewa Krystyna Szczepanska-Sadowska, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland; Marcelo Febo, University of Florida, United States |
ISSN: | 1663-9812 1663-9812 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fphar.2018.00755 |