Taking Severe Acute Malnutrition Treatment Back to the Community: Practical Experiences from Nutrition Coverage Surveys

• Published in: Frontiers in public health Vol. 4; p. 198
• Main Authors: Blanárová, Lenka, Rogers, Eleanor, Magen, Carine, Woodhead, Sophie
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 13.09.2016
• Subjects: Community; Community-based Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM); coverage; participatory; Public Health; Severe acute malnutrition (SAM); coverage; community-based management of acute malnutrition; severe acute malnutrition; community; participatory
• ISSN: 2296-2565; 2296-2565
• DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00198

The community-based management of acute malnutrition treatment model was introduced to respond to the limited coverage of the inpatient model. Yet until the introduction of quick and low-cost approaches to measuring coverage, its reach was unknown. Once the Coverage Monitoring Network (CMN) had been created to roll out the routine measurement of direct coverage estimates to implementers, they found that programs were reaching only a third of cases. The barriers found to be limiting coverage were the result of the limited perceived value, and therefore focus, on the community. Therefore, the Network used the coverage assessment methodology as a way to encourage implementers to engage more fully with the community. By introducing small changes to the project cycle, specifically a participatory approach to assessments, program design and implementation, the CMN has changed the way implementers engage with the community. Instead of viewing them as passive receivers of services, they have shifted their perspective to view them as service delivery partners. The process provides implementers with a deeper understanding of the context while allowing the community to better understand the program, its challenges, and the identification of solutions. The Network observed implementers from Ministries of Health, and non-governmental organizations, adjusted their understanding and approach to service provision, which is critical if we are to see sustainable increases in program coverage. These experiences show that there is an appetite from implementers in multiple contexts for these practical and simple tools for re-engaging the community.