Making a difference? A retrospective review of peripherally inserted central catheters: A single-center experience in Colombia

• Published in: SAGE open medicine Vol. 11; p. 20503121231201349
• Main Authors: García-Zambrano, Laura, Morales-Gómez, Daniel, Dennis-Halley, Michael J., Román-Ortega, Carlos F, Cabrera-Rivera, Paulo A., Parra, Marcela
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01.01.2023; Sage Publications Ltd; SAGE Publishing
• Subjects: Catheters; Nosocomial infections; Original; Venous access; Colombia; vascular access group; complications; Peripherally inserted central venous catheters; catheter-related bacteremia
• ISSN: 2050-3121; 2050-3121
• DOI: 10.1177/20503121231201349

Introduction: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are an effective tool as a medical device in patients who require them. However, it is a procedure that has been associated with multiple complications and possible negative outcomes for the health of the patients. This paper seeks to describe the main complications derived from the insertion and maintenance of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs), based on the experience of a vascular accesses group in a cardiovascular center in Colombia. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analytical study of the adult population undergoing PICC insertion at the Fundación Cardioinfantil-Instituto de Cardiología, during the period between 2019 and 2020 by the vascular access program, was performed. Results: The frequency of any registered complication was 15.9% for 2019 and 11.2% for 2020. Bleeding at the procedure site occurred in 15.3% during 2019 and 7.0% in 2020, making it the most frequent complication during the procedure. All the variables of complications associated with infection (bacteremia, phlebitis, and catheter-related infection) showed a decrease in 2020 compared to the previous year. The central line-associated bloodstream infection registered for the year 2019 was 1.94 bacteremia’s/1000 catheters-day compared to 0.29 bacteremia’s/1000 catheters-day. Conclusions: There has been a 4.7% reduction in the frequency of any registered complication after the implementation of the vascular access groups. Global and specific complications decreased significantly from 2019 to 2020. Notably, bacteremia, a common post-procedure complication, showed a substantial decrease in frequency compared to national and worldwide literature. It is also been described that complications associated with infection showed a decrease in 2020 compared to 2019. Whether or not all these findings are directly or somewhat related to the results stemming from the vascular access groups still needs further investigation.