The Primary Process and Key Concepts of Economic Evaluation in Healthcare

Economic evaluations in the healthcare are used to assess economic efficiency of pharmaceuticals and medical interventions such as diagnoses and medical procedures. This study introduces the main concepts of economic evaluation across its key steps: planning, outcome and cost calculation, modeling,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of preventive medicine and public health Vol. 55; no. 5; pp. 415 - 423
Main Authors Kim, Younhee, Kim, Yunjung, Lee, Hyeon-Jeong, Lee, Seulki, Park, Sun-Young, Oh, Sung-Hee, Jang, Suhyun, Lee, Taejin, Ahn, Jeonghoon, Shin, Sangjin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korean Society for Preventive Medicine 01.09.2022
대한예방의학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Economic evaluations in the healthcare are used to assess economic efficiency of pharmaceuticals and medical interventions such as diagnoses and medical procedures. This study introduces the main concepts of economic evaluation across its key steps: planning, outcome and cost calculation, modeling, cost-effectiveness results, uncertainty analysis, and decision-making. When planning an economic evaluation, we determine the study population, intervention, comparators, perspectives, time horizon, discount rates, and type of economic evaluation. In healthcare economic evaluations, outcomes include changes in mortality, the survival rate, life years, and quality-adjusted life years, while costs include medical, non-medical, and productivity costs. Model-based economic evaluations, including decision tree and Markov models, are mainly used to calculate the total costs and total effects. In cost-effectiveness or costutility analyses, cost-effectiveness is evaluated using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which is the additional cost per one additional unit of effectiveness gained by an intervention compared with a comparator. All outcomes have uncertainties owing to limited evidence, diverse methodologies, and unexplained variation. Thus, researchers should review these uncertainties and confirm their robustness. We hope to contribute to the establishment and dissemination of economic evaluation methodologies that reflect Korean clinical and research environment and ultimately improve the rationality of healthcare policies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1975-8375
2233-4521
DOI:10.3961/jpmph.22.195