Confabulating, Misremembering, Relearning: The Simulation Theory of Memory and Unsuccessful Remembering
This article develops a taxonomy of memory errors in terms of three conditions: the accuracy of the memory representation, the reliability of the memory process, and the internality (with respect to the remembering subject) of that process. Unlike previous taxonomies, which appeal to retention of in...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in psychology Vol. 7; p. 1857 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Media S.A
25.11.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This article develops a taxonomy of memory errors in terms of three conditions: the accuracy of the memory representation, the reliability of the memory process, and the internality (with respect to the remembering subject) of that process. Unlike previous taxonomies, which appeal to retention of information rather than reliability or internality, this taxonomy can accommodate not only misremembering (e.g., the DRM effect), falsidical confabulation, and veridical relearning but also veridical confabulation and falsidical relearning. Moreover, because it does not assume that successful remembering presupposes retention of information, the taxonomy is compatible with recent simulation theories of remembering. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 This article was submitted to Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology Reviewed by: Felipe De Brigard, Duke University, USA; Liliann Manning, University of Strasbourg, France Edited by: Francesco Ferretti, Roma Tre University, Italy |
ISSN: | 1664-1078 1664-1078 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01857 |