Aerobic Versus Resistance Training Effects on Ventricular-Arterial Coupling and Vascular Function in the STRRIDE-AT/RT Trial

The goal was studying the differential effects of aerobic training (AT) vs. resistance training (RT) on cardiac and peripheral arterial capacity on cardiopulmonary (CP) and peripheral vascular (PV) function in sedentary and obese adults. In a prospective randomized controlled trial, we studied the e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine Vol. 8; p. 638929
Main Authors Lekavich, Carolyn L, Allen, Jason D, Bensimhon, Daniel R, Bateman, Lori A, Slentz, Cris A, Samsa, Gregory P, Kenjale, Aarti A, Duscha, Brian D, Douglas, Pamela S, Kraus, William E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 01.04.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The goal was studying the differential effects of aerobic training (AT) vs. resistance training (RT) on cardiac and peripheral arterial capacity on cardiopulmonary (CP) and peripheral vascular (PV) function in sedentary and obese adults. In a prospective randomized controlled trial, we studied the effects of 6 months of AT vs. RT in 21 subjects. Testing included cardiac and vascular ultrasoundography and serial CP for ventricular-arterial coupling (Ees/Ea), strain-based variables, brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (BAFMD), and peak VO (pVO mL/kg/min) and peak O -pulse (O p; mL/beat). Within the AT group ( = 11), there were significant increases in rVO of 4.2 mL/kg/min (SD 0.93) ( = 0.001); O p of 1.9 mL/beat (SD 1.3) ( = 0.008) and the brachial artery post-hyperemia peak diameter 0.18 mm (SD 0.08) ( = 0.05). Within the RT group ( = 10) there was a significant increase in left ventricular end diastolic volume 7.0 mL (SD 9.8; = 0.05) and percent flow-mediated dilation (1.8%) (SD 0.47) ( = 0.004). Comparing the AT and RT groups, post exercise, rVO 2.97, (SD 1.22), ( = 0.03), O p 0.01 (SD 1.3), ( = 0.01), peak hyperemic blood flow volume (1.77 mL) (SD 140.69) ( = 0.009), were higher in AT, but LVEDP 115 mL (SD 7.0) ( = 0.05) and Ees/Ea 0.68 mmHg/ml (SD 0.60) = 0.03 were higher in RT. The differential effects of AT and RT in this hypothesis generating study have important implications for exercise modality and clinical endpoints.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Zahra K. Motamed, McMaster University, Canada
This article was submitted to Cardiovascular Imaging, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Reviewed by: Ciro Santoro, Federico II University Hospital, Italy; Haotian Gu, King's College London, United Kingdom; Trevor James King, McMaster University, Canada
ISSN:2297-055X
2297-055X
DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2021.638929