Automaticity revisited: when print doesn't activate semantics

• Published in: Frontiers in psychology Vol. 6; p. 117
• Main Authors: Labuschagne, Elsa M., Besner, Derek
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 10.02.2015
• Subjects: Attention; automaticity; Psychology; semantic Stroop; spatial cueing; visual word recognition; visual word recognition; spatial attention; spatial cueing; automaticity; semantic Stroop
• ISSN: 1664-1078; 1664-1078
• DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00117

It is widely accepted that the presentation of a printed word "automatically" triggers processing that ends with full semantic activation. This processing, among other characteristics, is held to occur without intention, and cannot be stopped. The results of the present experiment show that this account is problematic in the context of a variant of the Stroop paradigm. Subjects named the print color of words that were either neutral or semantically related to color. When the letters were all colored, all spatially cued, and the spaces between letters were filled with characters from the top of the keyboard (i.e., 4, #, 5, %, 6, and *), color naming yielded a semantically based Stroop effect and a semantically based negative priming effect. In contrast, the same items yielded neither a semantic Stroop effect nor a negative priming effect when a single target letter was uniquely colored and spatially cued. These findings (a) undermine the widespread view that lexical-semantic activation in word reading is automatic in the sense that it occurs without intention and cannot be derailed, and (b) strengthens the case that both implicit and explicit forms of visual word recognition require spatial attention as a necessary preliminary to lexical-semantic processing.