Six Weeks of Low-Load Blood Flow Restricted and High-Load Resistance Exercise Training Produce Similar Increases in Cumulative Myofibrillar Protein Synthesis and Ribosomal Biogenesis in Healthy Males

High-load resistance exercise contributes to maintenance of muscle mass, muscle protein quality, and contractile function by stimulation of muscle protein synthesis (MPS), hypertrophy, and strength gains. However, high loading may not be feasible in several clinical populations. Low-load blood flow...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in physiology Vol. 10; p. 649
Main Authors Sieljacks, Peter, Wang, Jakob, Groennebaek, Thomas, Rindom, Emil, Jakobsgaard, Jesper Emil, Herskind, Jon, Gravholt, Anders, Møller, Andreas B., Musci, Robert V., de Paoli, Frank V., Hamilton, Karyn L., Miller, Benjamin F., Vissing, Kristian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 29.05.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:High-load resistance exercise contributes to maintenance of muscle mass, muscle protein quality, and contractile function by stimulation of muscle protein synthesis (MPS), hypertrophy, and strength gains. However, high loading may not be feasible in several clinical populations. Low-load blood flow restricted resistance exercise (BFRRE) may provide an alternative approach. However, the long-term protein synthetic response to BFRRE is unknown and the myocellular adaptations to prolonged BFRRE are not well described. To investigate this, 34 healthy young subjects were randomized to 6 weeks of low-load BFRRE, HLRE, or non-exercise control (CON). Deuterium oxide (D O) was orally administered throughout the intervention period. Muscle biopsies from m. vastus lateralis were collected before and after the 6-week intervention period to assess long-term myofibrillar MPS and RNA synthesis as well as muscle fiber-type-specific cross-sectional area (CSA), satellite cell content, and myonuclei content. Muscle biopsies were also collected in the immediate hours following single-bout exercise to assess signaling for muscle protein degradation. Isometric and dynamic quadriceps muscle strength was evaluated before and after the intervention. Myofibrillar MPS was higher in BFRRE (1.34%/day,  < 0.01) and HLRE (1.12%/day,  < 0.05) compared to CON (0.96%/day) with no significant differences between exercise groups. Muscle RNA synthesis was higher in BFRRE (0.65%/day,  < 0.001) and HLRE (0.55%/day,  < 0.01) compared to CON (0.38%/day) and both training groups increased RNA content, indicating ribosomal biogenesis in response to exercise. BFRRE and HLRE both activated muscle degradation signaling. Muscle strength increased 6-10% in BFRRE (  < 0.05) and 13-23% in HLRE (  < 0.01). Dynamic muscle strength increased to a greater extent in HLRE (  < 0.05). No changes in type I and type II muscle fiber-type-specific CSA, satellite cell content, or myonuclei content were observed. These results demonstrate that BFRRE increases long-term muscle protein turnover, ribosomal biogenesis, and muscle strength to a similar degree as HLRE. These findings emphasize the potential application of low-load BFRRE to stimulate muscle protein turnover and increase muscle function in clinical populations where high loading is untenable.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Exercise Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
Edited by: Stephen D. Patterson, St Mary’s University Twickenham, United Kingdom
Reviewed by: Daniel Moore, University of Toronto, Canada; Vandre Casagrande Figueiredo, University of Kentucky, United States
ISSN:1664-042X
1664-042X
DOI:10.3389/fphys.2019.00649