An Electrophysiological Dissociation of Encoding vs. Maintenance Failures in Visual-Spatial Working Memory

Working memory (WM) performance varies substantially among individuals but the precise contribution of different WM component processes to these functional limits remains unclear. By analyzing different types of responses in a spatial WM task, we recently demonstrated a functional dissociation betwe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 11; p. 522
Main Authors Mayer, Jutta S., Korinth, Sebastian, Peters, Benjamin, Fiebach, Christian J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 24.03.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00522

Cover

More Information
Summary:Working memory (WM) performance varies substantially among individuals but the precise contribution of different WM component processes to these functional limits remains unclear. By analyzing different types of responses in a spatial WM task, we recently demonstrated a functional dissociation between confident and not-confident errors reflecting failures of WM encoding and maintenance, respectively. Here, we use event-related brain potentials to further explore this dissociation. Healthy participants performed a delayed orientation-discrimination task and rated their response confidence for each trial. The encoding-related N2pc component was significantly reduced for confident errors compared to confident correct responses, which is indicative of an encoding failure. In contrast, the maintenance-related contra-lateral delay activity was similar for these response types indicating that in confident error trials, WM representations - potentially the wrong ones - were maintained accurately and with stability throughout the delay interval. However, contra-lateral delay activity measured during the early part of the delay period was decreased for not-confident errors, potentially reflecting compromised maintenance processes. These electrophysiological findings contribute to a refined understanding of the encoding and maintenance processes that contribute to limitations in WM performance and capacity.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Kathrin Finke, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany
This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Reviewed by: Heinrich René Liesefeld, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany; Iris Wiegand, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Germany
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00522