Using Hierarchical Linear Models to Examine Approximate Number System Acuity: The Role of Trial-Level and Participant-Level Characteristics

• Published in: Frontiers in psychology Vol. 9; p. 2081
• Main Authors: Braham, Emily J, Elliott, Leanne, Libertus, Melissa E
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 12.11.2018
• Subjects: approximate number system; convex hull; hierarchical linear model; math ability; numerosity; Psychology; surface area; surface area; numerosity; hierarchical linear model; approximate number system; math ability; convex hull
• ISSN: 1664-1078; 1664-1078
• DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02081

The ability to intuitively and quickly compare the number of items in collections without counting is thought to rely on the Approximate Number System (ANS). To assess individual differences in the precision of peoples' ANS representations, researchers often use non-symbolic number comparison tasks in which participants quickly choose the numerically larger of two arrays of dots. However, some researchers debate whether this task actually measures the ability to discriminate approximate numbers or instead measures the ability to discriminate other continuous magnitude dimensions that are often confounded with number (e.g., the total surface area of the dots or the convex hull of the dot arrays). In this study, we used hierarchical linear models (HLMs) to predict 132 adults' accuracy on each trial of a non-symbolic number comparison task from a comprehensive set of trial-level characteristics (including numerosity ratio, surface area, convex hull, and temporal and spatial variations in presentation format) and participant-level controls (including cognitive abilities such as visual-short term memory, working memory, and math ability) in order to gain a more nuanced understanding of how individuals complete this task. Our results indicate that certain trial-level characteristics of the dot arrays contribute to our ability to compare numerosities, yet numerosity ratio, the critical marker of the ANS, remains a highly significant predictor of accuracy above and beyond trial-level characteristics and across individuals with varying levels of math ability and domain-general cognitive abilities.