A Framework for Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Data in Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Studies: A Case Study of Pesticide Usage in Eastern Uganda

Knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) studies guide the implementation of public health interventions (PHIs), and they are important tools for political persuasion. The design and implementation of PHIs assumes a linear KAP relationship, i.e., an awareness campaign results in the desirable societa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in public health Vol. 5; p. 318
Main Authors Muleme, James, Kankya, Clovice, Ssempebwa, John C, Mazeri, Stella, Muwonge, Adrian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 08.12.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) studies guide the implementation of public health interventions (PHIs), and they are important tools for political persuasion. The design and implementation of PHIs assumes a linear KAP relationship, i.e., an awareness campaign results in the desirable societal behavioral change. However, there is no robust framework for testing this relationship before and after PHIs. Here, we use qualitative and quantitative data on pesticide usage to test this linear relationship, identify associated context specific factors as well as assemble a framework that could be used to guide and evaluate PHIs. We used data from a cross-sectional mixed methods study on pesticide usage. Quantitative data were collected using a structured questionnaire from 167 households representing 1,002 individuals. Qualitative data were collected from key informants and focus group discussions. Quantitative and qualitative data analysis was done in R 3.2.0 as well as qualitative thematic analysis, respectively. Our framework shows that a KAP linear relationship only existed for households with a low knowledge score, suggesting that an awareness campaign would only be effective for ~37% of the households. Context specific socioeconomic factors explain why this relationship does not hold for households with high knowledge scores. These findings are essential for developing targeted cost-effective and sustainable interventions on pesticide usage and other PHIs with context specific modifications.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Harshad Thakur, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, India
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Public Health Education and Promotion, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health
Reviewed by: Frederick Ato Armah, University of Cape Coast, Ghana; Paraskevi Papaioannidou, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
ISSN:2296-2565
2296-2565
DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2017.00318