Long-Term Outcomes in Uveal Melanoma After Ruthenium-106 Brachytherapy

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy. The aim of this retrospective study was to report the results after ruthenium-106 (Ru-106) plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanoma in terms of tumor control, visual acuity, radiation-related complications, tumor recurrence, metastases...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in oncology Vol. 11; p. 754108
Main Authors Cennamo, Gilda, Montorio, Daniela, D' Andrea, Luca, Farella, Antonio, Matano, Elide, Giuliano, Mario, Liuzzi, Raffaele, Breve, Maria Angelica, De Placido, Sabino, Cennamo, Giovanni
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 03.01.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy. The aim of this retrospective study was to report the results after ruthenium-106 (Ru-106) plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanoma in terms of tumor control, visual acuity, radiation-related complications, tumor recurrence, metastases, and patients' survival rate during 4 years' follow-up. A total of 355 eyes from 355 patients have been treated with Ru-106 plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanoma between February 2011 and March 2020. Five patients were lost to follow-up, and then 350 eyes of 350 patients (mean age 58 ± 11 years) were enrolled in this retrospective study. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmic examination including echography and spectral domain-optical coherence tomography. The mean follow-up was 4 years (3 months to 9 years). After treatment, the mean tumor thickness was reduced to 1.75 ± 0.21 mm. Radiation complications were found in 63% of patients: 38% showed radiation maculopathy, 11% had optic neuropathy, and 14% developed cataracts. Cancer-free survival was 99%, 97%, and 85%, respectively, at 5, 7, and 9 years. Ru-106 plaque brachytherapy represents a reliable treatment of uveal melanoma. This technique is valid and safe with a low rate of ocular complications during a long-term follow-up.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Radiation Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology
Reviewed by: Corrado Spatola, University of Catania, Italy; Sunyoung Jang, Princeton Radiation Oncology Center, United States
Edited by: James Chow, University of Toronto, Canada
ISSN:2234-943X
2234-943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2021.754108