Predicting Well-Being Among the Elderly: The Role of Coping Strategies

This study aims to offer a wider view on the role of coping strategies on elderly's well-being by means of literature-based competitive structural equation models (SEMs). 857 older adults were surveyed. Measures included Ryff's scales of Psychological Well-being and the Coping Strategies Q...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 11; p. 616
Main Authors Galiana, Laura, Tomás, José M, Fernández, Irene, Oliver, Amparo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 03.04.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study aims to offer a wider view on the role of coping strategies on elderly's well-being by means of literature-based competitive structural equation models (SEMs). 857 older adults were surveyed. Measures included Ryff's scales of Psychological Well-being and the Coping Strategies Questionnaire. Competitive SEMs were tested. In the retained model, the religious coping dimension was removed, and the remaining dimensions were defined by problem- and emotion-focused coping, which explained both psychological and subjective well-being factors (χ (46) = 165.910, < 0.001; CFI = 0.906; GFI = 0.957; RMSEA = 0.058 [0.048,0.067]). Results pointed to the relevance of coping strategies for achieving adequate well-being, with emotion-focused coping strategies being the ones with negative and highest predictive power over the two dimensions of well-being. Interventions aiming at improving old people's well-being should, put their focus on decreasing the use of emotion-coping strategies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Rosario Cabello, University of Granada, Spain
Reviewed by: Petra L. Klumb, Université de Fribourg, Switzerland; Claudio Longobardi, University of Turin, Italy
This article was submitted to Developmental Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00616