PERFORMANCE OF ANALYSIS METHODS OF SLOPE STABILITY FOR DIFFERENT GEOTECHNICAL CLASSES SOIL ON EARTH DAMS
ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of less accurate analysis methods of slope stability, in order to reduce the number of operations used by the most accurate methods available in the literature. The study evaluated four methods for calculating slope stability. Fellenius...
Saved in:
Published in | Engenharia agrícola Vol. 36; no. 6; pp. 1027 - 1036 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
01.12.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of less accurate analysis methods of slope stability, in order to reduce the number of operations used by the most accurate methods available in the literature. The study evaluated four methods for calculating slope stability. Fellenius (FELLENIUS, 1936), Bishop (BISHOP, 1955), Simplified Bishop (BISHOP & MORGENSTERN, 1960) and Simplified Janbu (JANBU, 1973) were compared with the Spencer method (SPENCER, 1967), which is considered an accurate method for calculating the factor of safety (FS). The procedure was performed in scenarios with different soil groups according to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) (ASTM 2011), heights and slope inclinations, and under conditions of reservoir subject to fast and slow emptying. Thus, comparative analyses were made using the correlation index “r”, the accuracy index “d” (WILLMOTT et al, 1985) and the performance index “c” (CAMARGO & SENTELHAS, 1997). The methods that had optimal performance for the analyzed conditions were the Simplified Bishop, the Simplified Janbu and the Bishop methods; the Simplified Bishop method obtained a correlation coefficient of 99%. Thus, they can be used as alternative methods to replace the Spencer method in the analysis of slope stability on earth dams. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0100-6916 0100-6916 |
DOI: | 10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v36n6p1027-1036/2016 |