Contribution of Buffer Zone Programs to Reduce Human-Wildlife Impacts: the Case of the Chitwan National Park, Nepal

• Published in: Human ecology : an interdisciplinary journal Vol. 47; no. 1; pp. 95 - 110
• Main Authors: Lamichhane, Babu Ram, Persoon, Gerard A., Leirs, Herwig, Poudel, Shashank, Subedi, Naresh, Pokheral, Chiranjibi Prasad, Bhattarai, Santosh, Gotame, Pabitra, Mishra, Rama, de longh, Hans H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer 01.02.2019; Springer US; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Anthropology; Attitudes; Biodiversity; Buffer zones; Community involvement; Community participation; Conservation; Ecosystem integrity; Environmental Management; Funds; Geography; Intervention; National parks; Parks & recreation areas; Participation; Prevention; Reserves; Social Sciences; Sociology; Wildlife conservation; Nepal; Buffer zone; Human-wildlife conflict; Chitwan National Park, Nepal; Fences; Compensation
• ISSN: 0300-7839; 1572-9915
• DOI: 10.1007/s10745-019-0054-y

Buffer zones around parks/reserves are designed to maintain ecological integrity and to ensure community participation in biodiversity conservation. We studied the fund utilization pattern of buffer zone programs, mitigation measures practiced, and attitudes of residents in buffer zone programs of Chitwan National Park, Nepal. The buffer zone committees spent only a small portion (13.7%) of their budget in direct interventions to reduce wildlife impacts. Human-wildlife conflicts were inversely related to investment in direct interventions for conflict prevention and mitigation. Peoples' attitudes towards wildlife conservation were largely positive. Most of the people were aware of buffer zone programs but were not satisfied with current practices. We recommend that buffer zone funds be concentrated into direct interventions (prevention and mitigation) to reduce wildlife conflicts. Our findings will be helpful in prioritizing distribution of funds in buffer zones of parks and reserves.