Complement activation following first exposure to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil®): possible role in hypersensitivity reactions
Background: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil®) has been reported to cause immediate hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) that cannot be explained as IgE-mediated (type I) allergy. Previous in vitro and animal studies indicated that activation of the complement (C) system might play a causal role...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of oncology Vol. 14; no. 9; pp. 1430 - 1437 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
01.09.2003
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil®) has been reported to cause immediate hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) that cannot be explained as IgE-mediated (type I) allergy. Previous in vitro and animal studies indicated that activation of the complement (C) system might play a causal role in the process, a proposal that has not been tested in humans to date. Patients and methods: Patients with solid tumors (n = 29) treated for the first time with Doxil were evaluated for HSRs and concurrent C activation. HSRs were classified from mild to severe, while C activation was estimated by serial measurement of plasma C terminal complex (SC5b-9) levels. Increases in SC5b-9 were compared in patients with or without reactions, and were correlated with Doxil dose rate. Results: Moderate to severe HSRs occurred in 45% of patients. Plasma SC5b-9 at 10 min after infusion was significantly elevated in 92% of reactor patients versus 56% in the non-reactor group, and the rise was greater in reactors than in non-reactors. We found significant association between C activation and HSRs, both showing direct correlation with the initial Doxil dose rate. Conclusions: C activation may play a key role in HSRs to Doxil. However, low-level C activation does not necessarily entail clinical symptoms, highlighting the probable involvement of further, as yet unidentified, amplification factors. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Received 14 March 2003; revised 2 May 2003; accepted 3 June 2002 ark:/67375/HXZ-L2B9L2CS-C istex:1B12DF54CED26B55AA47FFFAFC28776A363E8B9B local:mdg374 |
ISSN: | 0923-7534 1569-8041 |
DOI: | 10.1093/annonc/mdg374 |