Individual Differences in Mental Accounting

Individual differences in mental accounting have rarely been studied, and empirical evidence regarding the relation between mental accounting and personality characteristics is scarce. The present paper reports three studies applying a Likert-type scale to assess the extent individuals engage in men...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 10; p. 2866
Main Authors Muehlbacher, Stephan, Kirchler, Erich
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 18.12.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Individual differences in mental accounting have rarely been studied, and empirical evidence regarding the relation between mental accounting and personality characteristics is scarce. The present paper reports three studies applying a Likert-type scale to assess the extent individuals engage in mental accounting practices. In each study, the five items of the measure loaded on a single dimension and had acceptable reliability, with a Cronbach's α between 0.72 and 0.77. Study 1 ( = 165) regards the mental processing of prior losses in the theater-ticket problem (Tversky and Kahneman, 1981). Study 2 ( = 114) is based on prior work on income source effects (Fogel, 1997) and analyzes mental accounting of prior gains. In both studies, individual differences in mental accounting moderated the effects of the experimental treatments. In an explorative survey conducted for Study 3 ( = 373), the extent of engaging in mental accounting was found to be positively correlated with being female, with conscientiousness, and financial literacy, and negatively related with education and non-planning impulsivity. Identification of individual differences and their correlates adds to existing evidence for some of the core assumptions of mental accounting theory. A practical implication of the findings is that providers of financial services must take individual differences into account when designing trainings and supportive tools for money management.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Luke Clark, University of British Columbia, Canada; Abigail Sussman, University of Chicago, United States; Eldad Yechiam, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Israel
ORCID: Stephan Muehlbacher, orcid.org.0000-0002-3665-4976; Erich Kirchler, orcid.org.0000-0003-4731-1650
This article was submitted to Decision Neuroscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Edited by: Monica Luciana, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, United States
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02866