The Relationship Between Austrian Tax Auditors and Self-Employed Taxpayers: Evidence From a Qualitative Study

A constructive, highly professional relationship between tax authorities and taxpayers is essential for tax compliance. The aim of the present paper was to explore systematically the determinants of this relationship and related tax compliance behaviors based on the extended slippery slope framework...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 10; p. 1034
Main Authors Gangl, Katharina, Hartl, Barbara, Hofmann, Eva, Kirchler, Erich
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 13.05.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A constructive, highly professional relationship between tax authorities and taxpayers is essential for tax compliance. The aim of the present paper was to explore systematically the determinants of this relationship and related tax compliance behaviors based on the extended slippery slope framework. We used in-depth qualitative interviews with 33 self-employed taxpayers and 30 tax auditors. Interviewees described the relationship along the extended slippery slope framework concepts of power and trust. However, also novel sub-categories of power (e.g., setting deadlines) and trust (e.g., personal assistance) were mentioned. Furthermore, also little-studied categories of tax behavior emerged, such as accepting tax behavior, e.g., being available to the tax authorities, or stalling tax behavior, e.g., the intentional creation of complexity. The results comprehensively summarize the determinants of the tax relationship and tax compliance behaviors. Additionally, results highlight future research topics and provide insights for policy strategies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Jane Goodman-Delahunty, Charles Sturt University, Australia
Reviewed by: Marius Van Dijke, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands; Binh Tran-Nam, University of New South Wales, Australia; Malgorzata Niesiobedzka, University of Bialystok, Poland; Sabina Kołodziej, Kozminski University, Poland
This article was submitted to Forensic and Legal Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01034