The Effects of Seed Money and Refunds on Charitable Giving: Experimental Evidence from a University Capital Campaign
We design a field experiment to test two theories of fund‐raising for threshold public goods: Andreoni predicts that publicly announced “seed money” will increase charitable donations, whereas Bagnoli and Lipman predict a similar increase for a refund policy. Experimentally manipulating a solicitati...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of political economy Vol. 110; no. 1; pp. 215 - 233 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
The University of Chicago Press
01.02.2002
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We design a field experiment to test two theories of fund‐raising for threshold public goods: Andreoni predicts that publicly announced “seed money” will increase charitable donations, whereas Bagnoli and Lipman predict a similar increase for a refund policy. Experimentally manipulating a solicitation of 3,000 households for a university capital campaign produced data confirming both predictions. Increasing seed money from 10 percent to 67 percent of the campaign goal produced a nearly sixfold increase in contributions, with significant effects on both participation rates and average gift size. Imposing a refund increased contributions by a more modest 20 percent, with significant effects on average gift size. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0022-3808 1537-534X |
DOI: | 10.1086/324392 |