Acute and late complications after hypofractionated intensity modulated radiotherapy in prostate cancer

Purpose The present study compared the complications associated with hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (Hypo-IMRT) of prostate cancer to conventionally fractionated IMRT (Conv-IMRT). Materials and methods Hypo-IMRT delivered 70 Gy in 28 fractions, whereas Conv-IMRT delivered 78 ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJapanese journal of radiology Vol. 35; no. 5; pp. 269 - 278
Main Authors Kozuka, Takuyo, Nakano, Masahiro, Hashimoto, Masatoshi, Gomi, Kotaro, Murofushi, Keiko Nemoto, Sumi, Minako, Yonese, Junji, Oguchi, Masahiko
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Tokyo Springer Japan 01.05.2017
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose The present study compared the complications associated with hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (Hypo-IMRT) of prostate cancer to conventionally fractionated IMRT (Conv-IMRT). Materials and methods Hypo-IMRT delivered 70 Gy in 28 fractions, whereas Conv-IMRT delivered 78 Gy in 39 fractions. Toxicity was graded with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0, weekly during radiotherapy, 1 month after radiotherapy, and annually in both patient groups. Results The median follow-ups were 39.1 and 38.7 months for patients in the Hypo- and Conv-IMRT groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in rates of acute and late adverse events. The proportions of grade 2 acute genitourinary complications were 48.4 and 51.2% in the Hypo- and Conv-IMRT groups, respectively. The presence of a baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of ten or more was the only significant prognostic factor for grade 2 acute genitourinary toxicity. The incidence of grade 2 late rectal hemorrhage at 3 years was 3.2 and 3.5% in the Hypo- and Conv-IMRT groups, respectively. Small rectal volume was significantly associated with grade 2 late rectal hemorrhage. Conclusion Regarding acute and late adverse events, hypofractionated IMRT for prostate cancer was well tolerated and comparable with conventionally fractionated IMRT. Clinical trial registration no. UMIN000003218.
ISSN:1867-1071
1867-108X
DOI:10.1007/s11604-017-0630-2