New reduced volume preparation regimen in colon capsule endoscopy

To evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed bowel preparation method for colon capsule endoscopy. A pilot, multicenter, randomized controlled trial compared our proposed "reduced volume method" (group A) with the "conventional volume method" (group B) preparation regimens. Grou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 18; no. 17; pp. 2092 - 2098
Main Author Kakugawa, Yasuo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited 07.05.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1007-9327
2219-2840
2219-2840
DOI10.3748/wjg.v18.i17.2092

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed bowel preparation method for colon capsule endoscopy. A pilot, multicenter, randomized controlled trial compared our proposed "reduced volume method" (group A) with the "conventional volume method" (group B) preparation regimens. Group A did not drink polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) the day before the capsule procedure, while group B drank 2 L. During the procedure day, groups A and B drank 2 L and 1 L of PEG-ELS, respectively, and swallowed the colon capsule (PillCam COLON® capsule). Two hours later the first booster of 100 g magnesium citrate mixed with 900 mL water was administered to both groups, and the second booster was administered six hours post capsule ingestion as long as the capsule had not been excreted by that time. Capsule videos were reviewed for grading of cleansing level. Sixty-four subjects were enrolled, with results from 60 analyzed. Groups A and B included 31 and 29 subjects, respectively. Twenty-nine (94%) subjects in group A and 25 (86%) subjects in group B had adequate bowel preparation (ns). Twenty-two (71%) of the 31 subjects in group A excreted the capsule within its battery life compared to 16 (55%) of the 29 subjects in group B (ns). Of the remaining 22 subjects whose capsules were not excreted within the battery life, all of the capsules reached the left side colon before they stopped functioning. A single adverse event was reported in one subject who had mild symptoms of nausea and vomiting one hour after starting to drink PEG-ELS, due to ingesting the PEG-ELS faster than recommended. Our proposed reduced volume bowel preparation method for colon capsule without PEG-ELS during the days before the procedure was as effective as the conventional volume method.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Telephone: +81-3-35422511 Fax: +81-3-35423815
Correspondence to: Dr. Yasuo Kakugawa, MD, Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan. yakakuga@ncc.go.jp
Author contributions: Kakugawa Y participated in the design of the study, data acquisition and interpretation, performed colon capsule endoscopy, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript; Saito Y participated in the design of the study, and in writing the manuscript; Saito S, Watanabe K, Ohmiya N, Murano M and Oka S performed colon capsule endoscopy and contributed to writing the manuscript; Arakawa T, Goto H, Higuchi K and Tanaka S participated in the design of the study, and in writing the manuscript; Ishikawa H participated in the design of the study, data acquisition, and writing the manuscript; Tajiri H participated in the design of the study, data acquisition and interpretation, and writing the manuscript; all authors have read and approved the submission version of the manuscript.
ISSN:1007-9327
2219-2840
2219-2840
DOI:10.3748/wjg.v18.i17.2092