Treatment of Fistula-In-Ano with Fistula Plug - a Review Under Special Consideration of the Technique
In a recent Cochrane review, the authors concluded that there is an urgent need for well-powered, well-conducted randomized controlled trials comparing various modes of treatment of fistula-in-ano. Ten randomized controlled trials were available for analyses: There were no significant differences in...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in surgery Vol. 2; p. 55 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Media S.A
16.10.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In a recent Cochrane review, the authors concluded that there is an urgent need for well-powered, well-conducted randomized controlled trials comparing various modes of treatment of fistula-in-ano. Ten randomized controlled trials were available for analyses: There were no significant differences in recurrence rates or incontinence rates in any of the studied comparisons. The following article reviews the studies available for treatment of fistula-in-ano with a fistula plug with special attention paid to the technique.
PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane medical database were searched up to July 2015. Sixty-four articles were relevant for this review.
Healing rates of 50-60% can be expected for treatment of complex anal fistula with a fistula plug, with a plug-extrusion rate of 10-20%. Such results can be achieved not only with plugs made of porcine intestinal submucosa but also those made of other biological or synthetic bioabsorbable mesh materials. Important technical steps are firm suturing of the head of the plug in the primary opening and wide drainage of the secondary opening.
Treatment of a complex fistula-in-ano with a fistula plug is an option with a success rate of 50-60% with low complication rate. Further improvements in technique and better studies are needed. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 Reviewed by: Jose M. Ramia, Regional Public Health System of Castilla La Mancha, Spain; Boris Eugeniev Sakakushev, University Hospital St George Plovdiv, Bulgaria; Tzu-An Chen, Taiwan Landseed Hospital, Taiwan Edited by: Sanoop Koshy Zachariah, MOSC Medical College, India Specialty section: This article was submitted to Visceral Surgery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery |
ISSN: | 2296-875X 2296-875X |
DOI: | 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00055 |