Standard MRI May Not Predict Specific Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture Characteristics

• Published in: Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine Vol. 9; no. 3; p. 2325967121992472
• Main Authors: Hoogeslag, Roy A.G., Buitenhuis, Margje B., Brouwer, Reinoud W., Derks, Rosalie P.H., van Raak, Sjoerd M., Veld, Rianne Huis in ‘t
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.03.2021; Sage Publications Ltd
• Subjects: Classification; Knee; Magnetic resonance imaging; Orthopedics; Sports medicine; ACL reconstruction; dynamic intraligamentary stabilization; biologic healing enhancement; MRI; ACL; ACL suture repair; biology of ligament
• ISSN: 2325-9671; 2325-9671
• DOI: 10.1177/2325967121992472

Background: There has been renewed interest in the concept of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) suture repair (ACLSR). Morphologic characteristics of the ruptured ACL remnant play a role in deciding whether a patient is eligible for ACLSR. However, no classification of these characteristics of ACL rupture on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans has yet been compared with intraoperative findings in the context of ACLSR. Purpose: To investigate the value of using preoperative MRI to predict specific characteristics of acute complete ACL rupture. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnostic); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 25 patients were included. Two radiologists classified ACL rupture location and pattern on preoperative 1.5-T MRI scans with a standard sequence; the results were compared with the corresponding findings at arthroscopy conducted by a single surgeon. The agreement between the MRI and surgical findings was calculated using Cohen κ values. Furthermore, the reliability coefficients of the MRI classifications within and between radiologists were calculated. Results: The agreement between MRI classification and arthroscopic findings for ACL rupture location was slight (Cohen κ, 0.016 [radiologist 1] and 0.087 [radiologist 2]), and for ACL rupture pattern, this was poor to slight (Cohen κ, <0 and 0.074). The intraobserver reliability of MRI classification for ACL rupture location was moderate for radiologist 1 and slight for radiologist 2 (Cohen κ, 0.526 and 0.061, respectively), and for ACL rupture pattern, this was slight for radiologist 1 and 2 (Cohen κ, 0.051 and 0.093, respectively). The interobserver reliability of MRI classification for ACL rupture location and pattern was slight between radiologists (Cohen κ, 0.172 and 0.040, respectively). Conclusion: In the current study, we found poor to slight agreement between MRI classification and arthroscopic findings of specific ACL rupture characteristics. In addition, the intra- and interobserver reliability for MRI classification of the ACL rupture characteristics was slight to moderate.